Cease and Desist Letter Outline
Key elements for a cease and desist letter.
Last Updated: 2026-02-05
Download This Template
Pay what you can — $49 recommended to support ongoing updates.
Helps maintain bilingual access and updates.
No payment required. Always free to access.
What is This?
A cease and desist letter is a formal written notice demanding that a person or entity stop a specific activity that infringes on your legal rights. While not a lawsuit itself, it serves as an official record that you identified the violation, communicated your objection, and gave the offending party an opportunity to comply before you pursue legal action. In US legal practice, sending a cease and desist letter is often a prerequisite to litigation — courts in many jurisdictions look favorably on parties who attempted to resolve disputes before filing suit.
When to Use
- ✓Someone is using your trademark, brand name, or logo without authorization
- ✓Your copyrighted content (text, images, software, music) is being reproduced or distributed without permission
- ✓A former employee or business partner is violating a non-disclosure or non-compete agreement
- ✓Another business is engaging in unfair competition or misappropriating trade secrets
- ✓Someone is making false or defamatory statements about you or your business
- ✓A party is breaching a contract and you want to demand compliance before escalating
- ✓Your patented invention or process is being used without a license
- ✓A domain name is being used in a way that infringes on your trademark (cybersquatting)
Key Elements
- •Sender identification — Full legal name, address, and capacity (individual, company, or attorney on behalf of client)
- •Recipient identification — Full legal name and address of the party engaging in the unauthorized activity
- •Factual description — Detailed, objective account of the infringing activity: what is being done, when it started, where it is occurring
- •Legal basis — The specific rights being violated with statutory citations (e.g., Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. § 1051, Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. § 101)
- •Specific demands — Exactly what actions the recipient must take (stop activity, remove materials, provide accounting of profits, etc.)
- •Compliance deadline — A reasonable but firm timeframe (typically 10–30 days)
- •Consequences of non-compliance — Statement that legal action will follow if demands are not met
- •Reservation of rights — Explicit statement that all rights and remedies are preserved
Types of Cease and Desist Letters
- •Trademark infringement — Unauthorized use of a registered or common-law trademark, trade name, or confusingly similar mark. Governed by the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.) at the federal level and state unfair competition statutes.
- •Copyright infringement — Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, display, or creation of derivative works. Governed by the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.). The DMCA takedown notice (17 U.S.C. § 512) is a related but distinct mechanism for online content.
- •Patent infringement — Unauthorized making, using, selling, or importing of a patented invention. Governed by 35 U.S.C. § 271. Patent C&D letters require particular care, as overly aggressive assertions can trigger declaratory judgment actions.
- •Breach of contract — Violation of contractual obligations such as non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), non-compete clauses, licensing agreements, or service contracts.
- •Defamation and disparagement — False statements of fact that harm reputation (defamation) or economic interests (trade disparagement). Standards vary significantly by state.
- •Trade secret misappropriation — Unauthorized acquisition, disclosure, or use of trade secrets. Governed by the Defend Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. § 1836) at the federal level and state versions of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
- •Harassment and stalking — Demands to stop unwanted contact, intimidation, or surveillance. Often involves state-specific anti-harassment statutes.
Legal Framework
Cease and desist letters operate at the intersection of multiple legal domains. There is no single federal "cease and desist letter statute" — instead, the letter derives its authority from the underlying substantive law being invoked. The letter itself is not a court order and carries no independent legal force; its power lies in documenting your claim and creating a record of notice.
At the federal level, the Lanham Act governs trademark claims, the Copyright Act governs copyright claims, and the Defend Trade Secrets Act covers trade secret misappropriation. State laws add additional layers: unfair business practices statutes (such as California Business & Professions Code § 17200), state trademark registration acts, and consumer protection laws.
In some contexts, sending a cease and desist letter is more than a courtesy — it is a legal necessity. For example, to recover statutory damages for willful copyright infringement, you may need to demonstrate that the infringer had actual notice. Similarly, some state consumer protection claims require a pre-suit demand letter. Trademark holders also have a duty to police their marks; failure to act against known infringers can weaken trademark rights over time.
How to Draft a Cease and Desist Letter
- 1.Investigate and document the violation. Before writing anything, gather evidence: screenshots, URLs, photographs, purchase records, correspondence, dates, and witness information. Thorough documentation strengthens your position and prevents the recipient from claiming ignorance.
- 2.Identify your legal basis. Determine which law or contract provision is being violated. Be specific — cite the statute section, patent number, trademark registration number, or contract clause. Vague or overbroad legal claims undermine credibility.
- 3.Draft the factual background. Write a clear, chronological account of the infringing activity. Stick to objective facts. Avoid emotional language, threats beyond what is legally available, or exaggerations that could be used against you.
- 4.State your demands clearly. List exactly what you want the recipient to do: stop the activity, remove materials, provide an accounting, pay damages, confirm compliance in writing. Each demand should be specific and actionable.
- 5.Set a reasonable deadline. Give the recipient enough time to review the letter with their own counsel and take the required action — typically 10 to 30 days. Unreasonably short deadlines may be seen as bad faith.
- 6.Explain the consequences. State that you will pursue legal remedies if the demands are not met, but avoid language that could be construed as extortion or harassment. Stick to remedies actually available under the applicable law.
- 7.Include a reservation of rights. Add a standard clause stating that you are not waiving any rights or remedies by sending the letter, and that all rights are expressly reserved.
- 8.Have an attorney review the letter. Even if you draft the letter yourself, having a licensed attorney review it before sending ensures legal accuracy and may carry additional weight with the recipient.
Delivery and Service
How you deliver the letter matters. The most common and recommended method is certified mail with return receipt requested (USPS), which provides proof that the letter was sent and received. For urgent matters, overnight delivery services (FedEx, UPS) with signature confirmation are also effective.
Email delivery is increasingly accepted but should be used as a supplement to, not a replacement for, physical mail. If you send by email, use a method that confirms delivery (read receipts, tracking). Some practitioners send the letter by both email and certified mail simultaneously.
If the recipient is outside the United States, international delivery introduces additional complexity. The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents may apply to pre-litigation communications in some contexts. For a simple cease and desist letter (as opposed to formal legal process), international courier services with tracking are generally sufficient.
After Sending: Possible Outcomes
- •Compliance — The recipient stops the activity, removes the infringing material, or otherwise meets your demands. This is the ideal outcome. Request written confirmation of compliance.
- •Negotiation — The recipient responds with a counter-proposal, such as a licensing agreement, partial compliance, or a request for more time. Many disputes are resolved through negotiation following a C&D letter.
- •No response — If the recipient ignores the letter, this strengthens your position in subsequent litigation, as you can demonstrate they had actual notice of your claims and chose not to act.
- •Denial or dispute — The recipient may deny infringement, challenge your rights, or assert their own defenses (fair use, first sale, prior use, etc.). This may lead to further negotiation or litigation.
- •Declaratory judgment action — In some cases, particularly patent disputes, the recipient may preemptively file a declaratory judgment action asking a court to rule that they are not infringing. This is a strategic risk to be aware of.
- •Counter-claims — The recipient may assert their own claims against you, such as tortious interference, abuse of process, or antitrust violations if your letter is deemed anticompetitive.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- •Sending the letter without sufficient evidence. A C&D letter based on suspicion rather than documented facts undermines your credibility and may expose you to counter-claims.
- •Using overly aggressive or threatening language. Courts and opposing counsel view inflammatory language as a sign of weak claims. Professional, measured tone is far more effective.
- •Making legal claims you cannot support. Asserting rights you do not actually have (e.g., claiming trademark rights in a generic term, or copyright in an idea) damages your credibility and may constitute fraud.
- •Setting unreasonable deadlines. Giving 24 hours to comply with complex demands signals bad faith. Allow a reasonable period for the recipient to consult counsel.
- •Failing to follow through. Sending a C&D letter and then taking no action when demands are ignored signals that your claims are not serious. Only send the letter if you are prepared to escalate.
- •Sending the letter to the wrong party. Ensure you have correctly identified the person or entity responsible for the infringing activity. Misdirected letters waste time and may alert the actual infringer.
- •Omitting the reservation of rights clause. Without this language, a court could potentially interpret your letter as limiting the scope of your claims.
- •Not keeping copies and proof of delivery. Always retain a copy of the letter and proof of delivery (certified mail receipt, tracking confirmation). These are essential evidence in any subsequent proceeding.
Cross-Border Considerations: US and Turkey
When the infringing party is in Turkey (or the infringement occurs across both jurisdictions), additional considerations arise. Turkish law recognizes the concept of a formal notice (ihtar/ihbarname), which serves a similar function to a US cease and desist letter. Under Turkish law, a notarized notice (noterden ihtar) sent through a notary public carries particular legal weight and creates an official record.
Intellectual property rights are territorial — a US trademark registration does not automatically protect your mark in Turkey, and vice versa. If you need protection in both jurisdictions, you must register in both. Turkey is a member of the Madrid Protocol, which provides a streamlined process for international trademark registration. Copyright protection, by contrast, arises automatically under both US and Turkish law (both countries are Berne Convention signatories), though registration in the US is required to file an infringement suit.
Enforcement of a US cease and desist letter in Turkey (or a Turkish ihtar in the US) has no direct legal mechanism — the letter serves as notice, but any enforcement action must be pursued in the appropriate jurisdiction under that jurisdiction's laws. In cross-border disputes, it is common to send parallel notices in both countries, each citing the applicable local law.
Cease and Desist Letter vs. Filing a Lawsuit
A cease and desist letter is not a substitute for legal action — it is a precursor to it. The letter is faster, cheaper, and less adversarial than litigation. Many disputes are resolved at the letter stage, saving both parties the cost and time of court proceedings.
However, in some situations, going directly to court is more appropriate: if the infringement is causing irreparable harm that requires an emergency injunction, if the statute of limitations is about to expire, if the infringer has already demonstrated they will not comply voluntarily, or if you need the discovery process to identify the full scope of the infringement.
The decision between sending a letter first versus filing suit immediately should be made with the advice of a licensed attorney who can assess the specific circumstances of your case.
Legal Disclaimer
This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney before use in actual legal matters.